Getty Images Content warning: This article discusses eating disorders Last week, the government launched its public consultation on the merits of calorie-labelling food and drink served outside the home. For anyone suffering with an eating disorder, dining out can prove to be an overwhelming experience. As someone who is painstakingly piecing her life back together after an existence defined by anorexia, I appreciate this more than most.
Toggle display of website navigation Feature: When will the West learn that it promises salvation — not destruction? We were dressed in new, heavy, uncomfortable clothes and had been seen off by our entire extended family, who had come to the airport with garlands and lamps; our foreheads were anointed with vermilion.
We were going to America. To get the cheapest tickets, our travel agent had arranged a circuitous journey in which we disembarked in Frankfurt, then were to take an internal flight to Cologne, and onward to New York. In Frankfurt, the German border officer scrutinized the Indian passports for my father, my sisters, and me and stamped them.
Download the Audm app for your iPhone. It was a British passport, given to citizens of Indian origin who had been born in Kenya before independence from the British, like my mother. The passport was literally not worth the paper it was printed on; it had become, in fact, a mark of Cain.
The German officer decided that because of her uncertain status, my mother might somehow desert her husband and three small children to make a break for it and live in Germany by herself. So we had to leave directly from Frankfurt. Seven hours and many airsickness bags later, we stepped out into the international arrivals lounge at John F.
A graceful orange-and-black-and-yellow Alexander Calder mobile twirled above us against the backdrop of a huge American flag, and multicolored helium balloons dotted the ceiling, souvenirs of past greetings. As each arrival was welcomed to the new land, the balloons rose to the ceiling to make way for the newer ones.
They provided hope to the newcomers: Look, in a few years, with luck and hard work, you, too, can rise here. All the way to the ceiling. For most of our history as a species, since we evolved from being hunter-gatherers to pastoralists, humans have not been attuned to the radical, continuous movement made possible by modernity.
We have mostly stayed in one place, in our villages. Between andthe overall number of migrants tripled, to 3. Today, a quarter of a billion people live in a country different from the one they were born in — one out of every 30 humans. If all the migrants were a nation by themselves, we would constitute the fifth-largest country in the world.
As climate change and political conflict drive ever greater numbers of people from the villages and war zones of the world, the displaced seek sanctuary anywhere they can find it. You think 5 million Syrian refugees are a problem now?
What happens when Bangladesh gets flooded and 18 million Bangladeshis have to seek dry land? At the same time, there has been a dramatic rise in income inequality. Today, the eight richest individuals, all men, own more than does half of the planet, or 3.
The concentration of wealth also leads to a concentration of political power and the redirection of outrage against inequality away from the elites and toward the migrants.
What is the difference between the refugee and the migrant? The refugee, as the Polish sociologist Zygmunt Bauman said in a interview with the New York Times, brings with him the specter of chaos and lawlessness that has forced him to leave his homeland.
He may have been a surgeon in his alleged nation, but here he is ready to perform any task — clean the bedpans in a hospital where he is more qualified than most of the doctors — but can never hope to be one of them because of the laws protecting their guild from people like him.
He must be abject, renouncing claims to an equitable share of the wealth of his new habitation or to any kind of political franchise. All he can hope for is a measure of personal security and the opportunity to remit enough money back to his family so that they can send the eldest boy to a private school near the refugee camp in which they await their chance to be reunited with their father, brother, husband in his marginal existence.
We reject the refugee in the orderly nations because he is the sum of our worst fears, the looming future of the 21st century brought in human form to our borders.
Everything could change radically, irrevocably, suddenly. The West is being destroyed, not by migrants but by the fear of migrants. Inthe Dutch government tried to make itself unattractive to potential Muslim and African migrants by creating a film, To the Netherlands, that included scenes of gay couples kissing and topless women sunbathing.
The film also showed the run-down neighborhoods where immigrants might end up living. It also informed migrants that, in Canada, it was not OK to bribe city officials. Also, that it was best to show up punctually for appointments. Of all refugees, the most frightening is the womanless male migrant, his eyes hungrily scanning the exposed flesh of the white woman.
The words the tabloids and right-wing politicians use to describe these Afghan or Moroccan men are similar to terminology used to describe black men in the United States in the early 20th century: InSouth Carolina Sen. Benjamin Tillman spoke from the U.According to the Bible, God killed or authorized the killings of up to 25 million people.
This is the God of which Jesus was an integral part. The Abolition of Slavery It has been said that no reform movement more significant, ambiguous, or provocative of later historical investigation then the drive to abolish slavery.
The democrats protested the denial of civil and political rights to slaves.4/4(1). modern-day slavery. From that conversation, Slavery Footprint was born. On September 22, , Slavery Footprint launched a website that asked a single question: California, the Slavery Footprint crew works to engage individuals, groups, and businesses to build awareness for and create action.
The only thing that would give the idea of reparations for slavery even the appearance of rationality is an assumption of collective guilt, passed . THE BIBLE DOCTRINE CONCERNING WAR. THE JUSTNESS OF OUR CAUSE. THE GUILT OF THE REBELLION. WHAT WE ARE FIGHTING FOR. THE QUESTION OF SLAVERY.
shall be peace; and the effect of righteousness. Slavery was prevalent in many parts of Africa for many centuries before the beginning of the Atlantic slave trade. There is evidence that enslaved people from some parts of Africa were exported to states in Africa, Europe, and Asia prior to the European colonization of the Americas..
The Atlantic slave trade was not the only slave trade from Africa, although it was the largest in volume and.